Here's the framing that separates AI projects that ship from AI projects that stall: AI is a feature of good software, not a substitute for it. The model is 20% of the build; the other 80% is data plumbing, permissions, evaluation, cost control, and UX — which is why AI projects belong with a software engineering firm, not a demo shop. That 80% is what this page describes. Shortcut: a free AI use-case assessment that tells you what's worth building — including, sometimes, "nothing yet."
This is the section most AI vendors don't have, and the reason to read this page:
Models: OpenAI GPT · Anthropic Claude · open-source (Llama-class) where data residency or cost demands — Orchestration: LangChain where warranted, direct APIs where not — Retrieval: vector databases (pgvector, Pinecone) — Integration: MCP for tool-connected agents — Infrastructure: AWS / Azure with the same IaC discipline as everything we ship.
Model-agnostic by design: routing lives in one layer, so when a better/cheaper model ships (they do, quarterly), you switch in days.
**AI use-case assessment (1 week, free).** We inventory candidate use cases, score them on ROI × feasibility × risk, and give you a ranked shortlist. If nothing clears the bar yet — usually a data-readiness problem — we tell you that and what to fix first. [AI readiness checklist →](/resources/ai-development/ai-readiness-assessment/)
**Pilot (4–8 weeks).** One use case, real data, measured against a baseline. Fixed price. The pilot's job is to produce a number: hours saved, accuracy achieved, cost per task.
**Production hardening.** Evaluation suite, guardrails, monitoring, cost controls, security review.
**Rollout & adoption.** Training, feedback loops, and the accuracy dashboard your leadership will ask for.
**Continuous improvement.** Models improve quarterly; your evaluation suite lets you adopt upgrades safely.
AI with domain guardrails: Healthcare (HIPAA-eligible endpoints, clinical-adjacent caution) · FinTech (auditability, model governance) · Legal (privilege-aware retrieval) · Insurance (claims triage) · Logistics · Ecommerce · All industries →
** 2–3 real AI case studies with measured results]**
- Client, industry]** — [use case]. Measured outcome: e.g., "X% of tickets resolved without human touch at Y% accuracy"]** → case study
AI feature added to existing software: $15K–$50K. RAG knowledge system or document-processing pipeline: $40K–$120K. Production AI agent with integrations and approval workflows: $60K–$200K+. Plus running costs (model usage + infrastructure) which we forecast per use case before you commit — typically $200–$3,000/month at mid-market scale. Full breakdown: AI application cost guide.
$15K–$50K to add an AI feature to existing software; $40K–$120K for a knowledge system or document pipeline; $60K–$200K+ for production agents. Pilots are fixed-price so the ROI number exists before the big commitment.
| AI capability | What it does for your business | Typical build |
|---|---|---|
| AI agents](/solutions/ai-agents | Execute multi-step work: triage tickets, prepare quotes, reconcile records, chase documents — with human approval gates where stakes demand them | 8–16 weeks |
RAG knowledge systems | Trustworthy answers from your documents — policies, contracts, manuals — with citations, not hallucinations. What is RAG → | 6–12 weeks |
Document processing | Extract structured data from invoices, claims, applications, POs — the highest-ROI AI category we deploy | 6–12 weeks |
| AI chatbots](/solutions/ai-chatbot-solutions | Customer and employee assistants that resolve, escalate cleanly, and never invent policy | 6–10 weeks |
| Voice AI](/solutions/voice-ai | Phone agents for intake, scheduling, and after-hours coverage | 8–14 weeks |
AI features in your existing product | Search that understands meaning, drafting, summarization, recommendations — added to software you already run | 4–10 weeks |
Predictive models | Forecasting, churn risk, anomaly detection on your operational data | 8–16 weeks |
Let's discuss how we can help you with ai app development.