AI features are sometimes wrong by design — the UX job is setting expectations, showing sources, making review effortless, and keeping the user in
Fill out the form and we'll get back to you within 24 hours.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Label AI-generated content, communicate confidence honestly, and scope the promise ('drafts for your review') — overclaiming is how one visible error destroys feature trust.
Citations and sources one click away, diffs for AI edits, and accept/modify/reject as first-class verbs — the review loop is the feature.
Designed 'I don't know' states with fallbacks, escalation paths, and never fabricated confidence — the refusal path is a UX deliverable, not an error condition.
Thumbs, corrections, and edit capture wired to the evaluation loop — users become the quality flywheel when the UI makes contributing effortless.
Skipping the discipline this article describes until an incident, audit, or stalled project forces it — every practice above is cheaper adopted early than retrofitted under pressure.
Let's discuss how we can help you with ux of ai features.
Contact Us Today