Label AI-generated content, communicate confidence honestly, and scope the promise ('drafts for your review') — overclaiming is how one visible error destroys feature trust.
Citations and sources one click away, diffs for AI edits, and accept/modify/reject as first-class verbs — the review loop is the feature.
Designed 'I don't know' states with fallbacks, escalation paths, and never fabricated confidence — the refusal path is a UX deliverable, not an error condition.
Thumbs, corrections, and edit capture wired to the evaluation loop — users become the quality flywheel when the UI makes contributing effortless.
Skipping the discipline this article describes until an incident, audit, or stalled project forces it — every practice above is cheaper adopted early than retrofitted under pressure.
Let's discuss how we can help you with ux of ai features.